The "Mad Dog" is killing the Libyans en masse while Obama is probably wondering where Libya actually is. If you ever wondered about the silence of the current useless president of the United States on the Libyan situation, all you have to do is to look at this photo. This might explain why:
I meant this is what Obama has done best so far: Voting present in times of crises. Does he not have any moral fiber in his body? Who does he think he is pleasing by keeping his mouth shut?Remember how he did not say a word against the Iranian regime for a week in June of 2009? Obama is voting present again. That's what he is good at: Stabbing the US allies like Israel, Great Britain and Canada while siding with tyrants, tinpot dictators and bloodthirsty Islamists. The above picture is absolutely shameful! I wonder how long would take this clueless president to shake Ahmadinejad's hands. Sad days for America!
World Net Daily has a fascinating piece on Obama’s mystery links to Libya's dictator Gadhafi
9 comments:
WInston, here's my take on it. http://bit.ly/h3Eh9T
" It may well be that the administration has already worked out its position on using force or even diplomacy backed by force to help put out some of the fires around us. To do so would legitimize the use of American power, and this is anathema to the administration."
He may have kept silent to ensure that American citizens are actually out of that country and safe before he makes a pronouncement that could endanger U.S. citizens there.
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/02/23/wh-worried-about-potential-hostage-crisis-in-libya/
This guy is clearly a wack job... I mean, come one, who refers to their own people as mice on international TV, and promises to fight until the last drop of blood is drained from his body in front of the UN. Obama is clearly not in loop, or doesn't care to be. Both are being useless, and ignorant.
Obama's mystery links to Gadhafi uncovered
Anonymous, I had already posted that link.
Understanding Muammar Gaddafi's View Of Obama Through Wikileaks
He may have kept silent to ensure that American citizens are actually out of that country and safe before he makes a pronouncement that could endanger U.S. citizens there.
That doesn't quite wash, though.
Sarkozy and Merkel came out with unambiguous statements critical of Ghadaffi's regime before all of their citizens were evacuated from Libya.
You could make the argument that Libya has a special history of animosity with the US of A vis a vis Lockerbie, the Berlin disco bombing and American airstrikes against one of Ghadaffi's compunds...but if that's the case, why would we have diplomatic offices there to begin with?
well put, fenway
Post a Comment