Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Obama. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Obama. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, February 25, 2011

Shame on Obama

Three superb pieces on Obama's inaction regarding the Libyan massacre. Obama is a disgrace!

Obama and Libya: The President Is Waiting And Doing Nothing. Why? from the leftist New Republic magazine.

Is Barack Obama Secretly Swiss? by Christopher Hitchens.

Foreign Policy Initiative to Obama: U.S., Allies Must Act on Libya via the Weekly Standard magazine.

Watch this CNN's interview with a Libyan woman who cries for help.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

It is not lost, yet

Look guys, the election in the US is not over until it is really over and McCain has a great chance of winning this thing. If you and I do not trust the mainstream media, why should we take their polls seriously? Of course they do all they can to demoralize the McCain's camp and force their own dirty agenda on us. What really matters is that, I still believe, the majority of the Americans have not drunk the Hussein Obama's Kool-Aid and I doubt they ever will. Unless they are really out of their minds and surprise all of us by coronating Hussein Obama on November 4th. All these said, I still think the American people are far more rational, wiser and cooler to elect an empty suited Marxist like Obama to the White House. By Nov 5th, we can tell if they have learned from the past or not. The examples are aplenty: Carter and Clinton presidencies are gifts that still keep giving. Carter's legacy is that after 29 years the Iranian regime still exports Islamic terrorism and is proud of it. President Clinton's legacy was the September 11th attacks and the rise of Jihadists through the 1990s. Simply because he treated those issues as if they were mere criminal cases. He didn't see the broader war that Islamists had declared on the Western infidels.

Hussein Obama will be worse than these two. Frankly he's even worse than Carter, in my opinion. His legacy, if elected, will be a disastrous one. He's already been so naive and soft that even French president Sarkozy is sounding the alarm about Obama's soft approach towards the Iranian regime. Marxist Obama has got the entire rational world worried. Let's not go there, my friends. Many of us understand that you in America are unhappy with what has been going on but you can not punish your great country by electing an inexperienced anti-American Marxist community organizer. Khomeini, Stalin, Mao, Ahmadinejad and Castro... et al offered Change & Hope too. But what are the results? The United States means a lot to us here who really care about it deeply. It's our beacon of hope and the only chance the dying Western civilization has got against the Tsunami of radical Islam and Leftists. Think twice before voting! Thank you...

Monday, July 27, 2009

A Mammoth Task

It's funny. What is funny you ask? It's very funny that we're struggling against two tyrannies. One is run by a clueless Marxist in Washington and the other one is Khamenei's regime.

The Iranian people are fighting a vicious system armed to the teeth on a daily basis in the streets and alleys of their cities. And at the same time, the pro-tyranny Hussein Obama and his useless State Dept are doing their best in throwing the mullahs a life line. A life line the mullahs do not deserve or need now. They're dying for good. Why is the US government doing this? Whose side is Obama on? Basically I know the answer since I have seen how he has sided with all the tyrants of the world from Honduras, Cuba, Libya to Russia and Iran in the past 6-7 months but someone gotta ask him the question. Is he really trying to save the mullahs? If yes, then why? What is in it for him?

I guess it's fair to say that the whole world condemned the mullahs this past weekend. Is it not time for this clueless president and his pro-tyranny government to stop supporting the mullahs? What do mullahs have that attract them? I mean, I am sure the oil rich regime could send Obama some more Tony Rezko type persons but I know it borders silly conspiracy. I mean, what the White House is doing to prop up the regime is so stupid that I can't find any reasonable explanations for it. Other than material interests, it can't be anything else. Ask a high school kid about this dilemma and you can get a straight-forward answer.

Is it not remarkable that in the midst of a huge power struggle within the mullahocracy, the Obama people are trying to negotiate a deal? Hey morons... maybe you should understand that a peaceful democratic Iran won't need nuclear weapons. Wait until these savages are gone. Can't you?

I guess we've a mammoth task at hand and it is to fight two tyrannies: Obama's and Khamenei's. Which one's easier to defeat?

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Chump Diplomacy

Obama's Chump Diplomacy:
    "In response to Iranian intransigence, Obama is supposed to be poised to crack down with harsh sanctions supported by the Russians and Chinese, won over by Obama's accommodating gestures. Neither is likely to go along, though. True to his word, Obama has worked a remarkable change in America's reputation in the world - from purported bully to notorious chump in less than a year."
Obama is a weak man, intellectually and politically.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Libya & Obama

The "Mad Dog" is killing the Libyans en masse while Obama is probably wondering where Libya actually is. If you ever wondered about the silence of the current useless president of the United States on the Libyan situation, all you have to do is to look at this photo. This might explain why:

I meant this is what Obama has done best so far: Voting present in times of crises. Does he not have any moral fiber in his body? Who does he think he is pleasing by keeping his mouth shut?

Remember how he did not say a word against the Iranian regime for a week in June of 2009? Obama is voting present again. That's what he is good at: Stabbing the US allies like Israel, Great Britain and Canada while siding with tyrants, tinpot dictators and bloodthirsty Islamists. The above picture is absolutely shameful! I wonder how long would take this clueless president to shake Ahmadinejad's hands. Sad days for America!

World Net Daily has a fascinating piece on Obama’s mystery links to Libya's dictator Gadhafi

Monday, January 18, 2010

1 year of failure

When left wing publications such as 'The Economist' say Obama's first year has been 'not great' then you must know that there must be something very wrong.

Robert D. Kaplan urges Obama to be more like President Reagan in supporting the Iranian protesters but I think he has no principle to be like any one of that stature. Obama's main agenda is to transform the American society forever and turns it into a failed socialist state. That is his legacy and I am unsure if he really cares about a possible foreign policy legacy which most US presidents tend to leave behind. It's just shameful to see so much inaction on behalf of this empty suit president. Does he really not understand the implications of a free Iran?
    "An Iran that is both democratic and Shiite would tip the balance against the Sunni Wahabi extremism emanating from Saudi Arabia. And, in a globally networked world, where news of such regime change could not easily be suppressed, leaders in similarly autocratic countries like Venezuela and China would have cause for concern."
Obama had the best chance this past 9-10 months to make a difference and leave a good name behind for himself. He missed that chance!

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Change

McCain wants to change Washington DC's culture of corruption and irresponsibility for good but Hussein Obama wants to change America because he really doesn't care about it. He, like many other anti-US Leftists, doesn't like America the way it is. This is scary! The political culture within the US government, of which Obama's party is a major part, has been responsible for the current mess. Don't change America! Remember that all known fascist dictators of the world including Hitler, Stalin, Khomeini, Mao and Castro offered the same crap. It really is not hard for president Obama and a majority run democratic congress to shape the United States the way they'd like: Socialism, banning radio talk shows and conservative media outlets, jailing prominent conservative and outlawing the parts of the US constitution they don't like. Do not let the Socialist wing of the DemoNRatic party led by Obama take over your country. Keep on fighting and vote for McCain and GOP candidates on Nov 4th.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Obama's deal with Iran's regime

What do I think of the deal between Obama and the Iranian regime over the regime's nuclear program? I think it is horrible. I think it is a cop out. An easy way for Obama to shirk responsibility yet again. Who in their right minds could see the day when the President of the United States would be the Iranian Mullahs' primary protector and ally?

So in that sense, I think, Obama has managed to prop up the Iranian regime. And he has de-moralized an army of pro-freedom Iranians who a few years ago took to the streets again hoping to get rid of the Mullahs.

It is a bad deal for the American people, for the Israelis and for the Iranian people. But the question remains: What's it with the US democrats' love for tyrants and mass murderers? Can any one answer that?


Friday, October 24, 2008

Coronating Obama

The fact that Mullahs prefer Obama is undeniable. This morning I was chatting with a friend who is living in a religious town in NE of Iran. She was saying that the regime media outlets have already coronated Barky Obama as the next president of the United States. Apparently the criminal regime of Iran will be a lot happier if Hussein O got his way into the White House. Mullahs know that appeasement offered by Barky O and Slow Joe is exactly what they need to buy time to finish their dangerous projects. Also look at what MSNBC reporter says from Iran:
    "Others seem to believe that the hard-line policies of Sen. John McCain may be exactly what are needed to deal with the current Iranian regime. "I think McCain should become president, America needs a strong experienced man to deal with this region," said a student who spoke on the condition of anonymity."
P.S: In the meantime the Mullahs talk about targeting a major European city and have reminded us that they are stupid enough to attack Israel. Also some Obama's aides praise Iran.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Appeaser in Chief

I believe when it comes to Iran, Obama is a moron. But the fact/notion that Iranian people want the American support was not cooked by neo-cons or crazy Zionists on blogosphere. See this report by ultra-liberal PBS News Hour program:
    "The protesters also appealed for U.S. support. They chanted, "Obama, Obama, you are either with them or with us."
Zer0bama is siding with tyranny again as he has in Honduras, Cuba, Burma and else where. Shame on this fool in the White House! He's a disgrace...

ABC News has more on that.

Updated on Friday: Washington Post: Obama's policy is objectively aiding the Tehran regime and harming the opposition in their ongoing struggle.

What do Iranians want: Radio Free Europe has a piece.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Racist regime

Iranian official Mohammad Javad Larijani dropped the n-word while attacking Obama at a meeting with so-called engineers. Here is PBS reporting:

Mohammad Javad Larijani criticized the policies adopted by U.S. President Barack Obama and referred to him using a racial epithet.

“When Barack Obama was sworn into office he talked of verbally engaging Iran,” the U.C. Berkeley graduate was quoted as saying. “What has changed is that today this [the equivalent of the N-word in Farsi] talks of regime change in Iran.”

In a Saturday meeting at the Islamic Engineers Society, Larijani said, “I am not a racist, but I must respond to this man [Obama] in some way.”

Larijani’s brother, Ali, is the speaker of Majles (Parliament). Another brother, Sadegh, is head of the judiciary.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Lebanonizing Iraq

Iranian regime will turn Iraq into another Lebanon beginning January 1st, 2012. Why? Because a weak and intensely ideologue empty suit aka 'Obama' has decided to play politics with a newly liberated nation and the US national interests. Thus giving the Islamic regime of Iran a clear victory in the region.

Hassan Nasrallah the thug who heads Lebanon's terror group Hezballah has already declared this as an historic defeat for the United States. Does Obama understand the enormous repercussions of his stupid decision? The US military pull out from Iraq will enable the Iranian regime to bring Iraq further into its own sphere of influence and destabilize the only true Arab democracy in the heart of the middle-east.

Will Obama be able to hold his head high 20 years from now if the gains made in Iraq go the wrong way? I doubt it since he doesn't seem to care. All Obama cares about is himself and his own ego. America 'elected' an idiot in 2008 and is now paying a heavy price for that stupidity. Shame!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Ignorance led to Obama

First off, I am now in California again. Visited Reagan library and it was an awesome experience for me. But let me be very blunt: Ignorance among the US voters led to an Obama victory this Tuesday. Period!

What I have seen in the past few days in my travels across the US is the level of ignorance and illiteracy among the liberal or left leaning voters. Most of them are not aware of world events and act like adolescent people. None know any thing about history. That's a big problem for an America which wishes to remain a superpower. Aside from "affirmative action" who has already got all of us an Obama presidency, ignorance and leftist values have played major roles in damaging this once great country. Uninformed people tend to be liberals. For example, I held long conversations with those who voted for Hussein Obama and none of them knew any thing about the world beyond their county or state borders. Honestly, none of those idiots I talked to did know what G8 is or, what is the name of the Canadian capital city. These are issues that I don't know how can be addressed. This is not a blame game. The Conservatives did not do their job properly either. Of course, the Conservative movement in the United States was dealt a defeating blow and a Reaganesque character is needed to restore the confidence of the Conservatives. Unfortunately, something should be done about those who know nothing about the world and yet decide the future and lives of other people. The uninformed, ignorant, play-station and lazy bone generation need to be taught history so they know facts. There's a long road ahead of us to take America back and make it a great country once again.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

We Don't Care

I have been vocal in my disapproval of Obama's presidency and his radical leftist agenda in destroying the American society. But one could say that it's their country and internal politics shouldn't concern me much, even though I do care about the United States as much as I care about what's happening in Iran. I see how Iran and America have had a glorious past and how they can be friends again. I know that the United States has been a force for good in the world and it should continue to be so. But as far as I see Mr. Obama has been busy disabling/dismantling the United States arsenal of freedom with his massive public spending bills and coward attitude in matters of foreign policy and has aimed to really turn America to a socialist dead-land like France, Canada or Britain. That said, nothing has enraged me more about him than his bizarre and dangerous approach towards the Iranian regime since taking office in January. He's proven to be a dangerous man.

While the mullahs are butchering the best and the brightest of Iran, the shameless Obama and his minions are still trying to revive this dead regime in Tehran. This is outrageous. I really don't get it. What's in it for them? Don't they understand the implications of a free Iran for the whole world? Don't they understand that a free Iran will greatly benefit the American interests in the region and through out the world. Don't they really understand that a free and peaceful Iran can help roll back Russian's outreach in the region and curtail the radical Islamic terrorism in the region? Why don't they understand this simple fact of geopolitics? Why can't he bring himself up to talk against our common foe and denounce them?

Oh well, I forgot what I said above. Obama doesn't like to see his own country superior to others. He doesn't have the moral courage to stand up for the American values. He's busy destroying the American society by offering socialized medicine and cap & trade bill. This is just preposterous and shameful. As we've all seen in the past few weeks, the majority of the Iranians do not want their rulers any more. Why would the White House and State Dept want to negotiate with an illegitimate government? It's like the US government saying 'We don't care about your cause' or 'we don't care if they are killing you, we want to save our own skin'. Just like the colonialists in Europe for the past 30 yrs. Those morons in charge of Iran policy in the US State department and the idiots in the White House must be either insane or totally ignorant. Words can't even describe my anger!

I think I am expecting a lot from a government and a US president who is ashamed of his own country. Guess we're expecting a lot from a man who shakes hands with dictators of the world and accepts gifts from them. What will the USA look like by the time this idiot is out of office in 2012?

If you know why these jerks want to keep the Iranian regime on life support then drop me a line and enlighten me please.

new update: Why do we hate Russia

دولت حسین اوباما همچنان بر مذاکره با رژیم ایران پافشاری میکند. مذاکره با رژیم جنایتکار ایران چه ثمره ای برای این عده داره من که متوجه نیستم. دولت ایران مورد قبول مردم ایران نیست و اونوقت این عده بی شرم در واشنگتن هنوز بر مذاکره با اخونده پافشاری میکنند. واقعا که رو میخواد بخدا

Friday, October 9, 2009

Zero Won

Obama isn't the first American president to win the Nobel Peace Prize, but he's the first to win it without having accomplished anything. Here are a few left leaning media outlets that are skeptical of this laughable news today:

Time magazine believes this will hurt Obama. Britain's Times of London newspaper commentary: Absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize. The Economist magazine questions the confidence of this man.

I mean, aside from the stupid decision by the Nobel committee what has Obama achieved in his life time to deserve such a silly prize? Nothing!
To end this short piece, I'd like to draw your attention to this excellent piece on American Thinker website:
    "It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, is historically illiterate, and woefully small minded for the size of the task-- all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from de-laminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience."
This is ridiculous and even embarrassing!

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Sworn Enemies

If I had any doubt about pro-Mullah nature of the Obama regime, those doubts are now turned into certainty and solid belief. Today NPR reports that the White House has called Ahmadinejad the 'elected leader' of Iran. At a time when world leaders like British PM Brown and German Chancellor Merkel have refused to recognize the Iranian government, this dangerous move is highly insulting and offensive, especially to thousands of Iranians who were killed or are now in jail. How can the US govt justify this? I guess Obama's pro-tyranny character has played a role here again. I wonder what Mullahs have offered Hussein O? Did they send in their own version of Tony Rezko to buy a house for him? I mean, what is it that makes dealing with the murdering mullahs of Iran so attractive for this idiot US president? Do I sound angry? Hell yeah! I am freaking outraged.

This just reinforces my hatred for the Democrats in the US and will add to the general mistrust the Iranian people have had for these anti-freedom idiots who call themselves Democrats. After all another DemoNRat helped the mullahs come to power in 1979. How could you be voting for these a**holes when they clearly side with tyrants and murderers? And I really wonder how any Iranian-American citizen could call him/herself a decent person and still vote for these anti-Iranian politicians?

I'd say we have two sworn enemies: 1- Khamenei and his regime, 2- Obama and his regime

با شما ایرانی های مقیم امریکا هستم که خودتون رو عضو حزب دموکرات امریکا میدونید. چطوری به این عده احمق که همدست اخوندهای ایران بوده و هستند رای میدهید؟

Update: Robert Gibbs, the dumb Obama spokesman, backtacked on his remarks but the damage is done. The lying mullahs will use the previous statements to show they've powerful allies in the world including the White House.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Scaring Me

Let me be clear again. Hussein Obama scares the hell out of me and the likes of me for his naive and anti-American foreign policy views. Mostly his "I'll unconditionally talk to Iran policy" scares me more than ever now. No conditions to talk to a regime that kills its own people and Americans? It'll be shameful. Don't you think?! (From his website)

The freshman senator from state of Illinois is a radical Marxist with many suspicious connections. He has not accomplished any thing in his life to be fit/experienced to run a pizza parlor in Chicago, let alone a country that is in midst of a brutal struggle against the criminal Islamonazis. I don't understand how any sane person in his/her right mind could vote for such a hypocrite, radical two-faced politician. Any ways, if he's elected, all our hopes for any type of meaningful change in Iran will fade away for a long long time to come. Is Sen. Hussein Obama willing to reward the regime mistreatment of its people by not bringing it up in his so-called talks with them? Hussein Obama speaks a lot about his desire to have talks with the Iranians but he never says how he wishes to do so. What's his plan to stop the criminal mullahs from obtaining the WMDs? I feel sorry for those misinformed people who would like to see him in the White House in 2009. They'll be as much sorry as those who voted for Dhimmi Carter back in 1976. Let's hope this junior senator with shady connections won't be the next POTUS. He'll be a tragedy for the United States.

Why thugs like Obama?

اگر از ایرانیان مقیم امریکا هستید، دوست دارم بدونم به چه کسی در انتخابات اینده رای خواهید داد... ایا حاضرید به نامزد حزب دموکرات سناتور حسین اوباما که خواهان گفتگوی بدون قید و شرط با ملایان جنایتکار ایران هست رای بدهید؟ یا به سناتور جمهوریخواه جان مک کین؟ با توجه به اینکه مک کین با اخوندها مذاکره نخواهد کرد و من هم شخصا معتقدم مذاکره قدرتهای جهانی مثل اروپا و امریکا با ملایان جانی به پایداری بیشتر حکومت اسلامی منجر خواهد شد. این انتخابات برای ما ایرانیان داخل و خارج از کشور بسیار مهم و حیاتی هست و شمایی که در امریکا زندگی میکنید میتونید موثر باشید و انتخاب درست شما برای اینده ازادی و دموکراسی در ایران قطعا تاثیر گذار خواهد بود

Monday, July 28, 2008

Mom's Updates

It's been a while and I should have provided some updates on my mom's illness. Tonight I thought it is a good idea to share some new info with you. In short order, the Chemo is over and the results have been positive. Her physician informed us that the tumors are shrunk and some gains have been made through Chemotherapy, diet and spiritual empowerment. Also, the chance of re-occurring is not high for the next couple of years. Thanks to your donations, things are now better and there's a good chance for her to come here for a short visit and we'll be able to reunite after many years.

As you know, I constantly get in touch with family and close friends inside of Iran to stay informed about the country. Moreover talking to my mother and sister gives me an opportunity to see what's going on through the eyes of Iranian women. Last time I talked to my sister, she talked about heavy presence of religious police and Basiji militants across the city and emphasized on the enormous amount of stress that she and her friends endure every time they leave the house for either university or daily errands. And my mother told me she has heard people talking about the possibility of an Obama presidency and its tragic consequences for the ordinary people inside of the country. Most people seem not to talk his idea of direct negotiations with the current regime at all. When I asked about her own feelings, she said, I pray Obama would lose in the general elections to Sen. McCain. I was told that many people appear to be deeply worried about Obama's offer of direct talks with the Mullahs. Most believe that the regime is in dire situation and any negotiations can save the regime from falling.

As you better know, things are getting worse in Iran on a daily basis. Inflation is basically killing people's ability to provide for their families. Retirees have not received their pensions years after their retirements and now the mass executions of alleged criminals in Tehran seems to be the new round of terror tactics to scare the ordinary people off. The regime is worried and feel threatened from within and abroad and it is doing any thing to ward off these threats. The current diplomatic pressure is not enough and won't topple the regime but empowering the Iranian people can do that. Keep up the pressure and empower us to determine our future.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Reagan's Libyan Dilemma

I have been reading President Reagan's autobiography "an American life" as this past February marked Reagan's 100th birthday. I have watched so many documentaries about him and had read others' account of his life and time in government, but had read little or nothing by him. So this was an eye opener. A man from humble beginning rose to become the 40th US president. It is an inspiring life story. Frankly, I believe President Reagan is probably among the top three great presidents of the 20th century and probably among the top 5 in the US history. Now I was just reading chapter 48 of the book in which he discusses the issue of Libya and Qaddafi's support for international terrorism. On page 292 I came across this paragraph:
    "With hundreds of Americans living in Libya, there were limitations on what we could do in response to this evil man. Through diplomatic back channels, we sent word to Qaddafi that any acts of terrorism directed at Americans would be considered acts of war and we would respond accordingly. After the dogfight over the Gulf of Sidra, I hoped he realized I meant what I said."
Compare and contrast the above leadership style with the pathetic and weak leadership of Obama in dealing with the genocidal maniac in Tripoli. Obama has used that same line of reasoning to avoid taking action against the Libyan dictator, whereas President Reagan had no qualms about how to proceed with his own Libyan dilemma in 1980s. ex-Sen. Obama (the current US president) is truly the second coming of that other loser Jimmy Carter.
How sad! [+]

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Obama fools us

Obama fooled all of us:
    "A victory for those who believe the state is better qualified to raise children than the family, for those who prefer teachers' unions to teaching and for those who are naively convinced that if the West is sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and terror will dissolve as quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist celebrity."
Of course, ignorance led Obama to victory. It's just freaking sad to say good-bye to America we all loved. A know-nothing generation forced a know-nothing empty suit on all of us. They fooled us!